Teenagers Arrested for Sexual Assault
This story is so wrong, and on so many levels, that I must write about it.
The young woman was sexually assaulted having passed out from drink. The assailants took photos of this crime and broadcast them on social media. Subsequently, the young woman committed suicide.
Can it be proven that her suicide directly resulted from the shame she felt about having these awful images displayed? That's a legal question.
But I would say very likely. If the photos had not been broadcast around her high school, she would not have taken her life.
This is what the news story seems to emphasize -- and this is a very wrong story, very wrong.
The crime was the assault. That was the harm, the evil thing. The photos made it worse, but the crime was the assault.
The story says it was sexual assault. The story says she fell asleep. It doesn't say she passed out -- but I'm thinking she passed out from too much booze and was unconscious and was unaware that she was being assaulted.
What else do I know? The story says the assailants were three 16-year-old-old boys. And what do we know about 16-year-old boys? They are dumber than a cow, and they are about four to five times hornier than the average adult male who is reading this newsletter. They are plug stupid and they easily go out of control.
Did anyone ever tell these boys that it was wrong, that you are not supposed to touch, disrobe, or fondle a female friend (let's assume they were friends) if she is passed-out drunk? And not take photos while you're doing this, and not share these photos on Facebook. Did anybody tell them anything?
I'm going to dig into this a little further -- to discuss the matter that didn't seem to get into the news story about this crime and death.
The girl was drunk. She was 15 and she was drunk. Can that ever be a good thing? It happens, but it can't be a good thing.
Not just drunk, but passed-out drunk.
The story does not say whether the three assailants were drunk, but I'm thinking they were also drunk, although clearly not passed-out drunk, but conscious enough to commit the crime, conscious enough to know it was wrong (assuming someone told them it was wrong).
Three 16-year-old boys, dumb as a cow when they're cold sober, extravagantly horny -- if you can remember how you felt when you were that age -- and then fueled up with booze, in the company of pretty women similarly fueled up.
I can think of numerous bad and dangerous outcomes in this scenario. Suicide by Facebook photo is only one horrible possibility, but there are many ways this party ends badly.
You know what I'm thinking -- if they hadn't been drunk they wouldn't have assaulted the girl, and if she hadn't been drunk, she wouldn't have let them.
Is my thinking clear here? You take away the booze and there's no assault, no photos, and no suicide.
Teenagers are capable of hurting themselves and others even under ideal circumstances.
But still, we should strive to keep them and guard them and protect them.
We need to be watching over them. We need to not only tell them what to do and not do, we need to be present, and not leave them alone in large groups for long periods of time.
Being watched and being instructed, they are less likely to get drunk and commit the crime of sexual assault.
To me, the sexting, the photos and the social media angle is secondary, yes, worse, but let's focus on the crime -- which was the sexual assault, and what led up to it and how to prevent it from happening again.
So I'm saying -- tell the boys this short message -- 1. respect women 2. no means no and 3. keep your hands to yourself. ....... You might need to repeat this.
If your No means No and your Yes means Yes, then they will get the idea about what No means. But if your No means kinda, sorta, maybe, then they will learn that No doesn't really mean No, so make it plain and clear.
I recommend hypocrisy. It doesn't matter what you did when you were that age. If it's wrong, tell them it's wrong.
And finally, we should all realize that adolescence is a dangerous age and always will be.
Too Serious. I'm not going to be getting too serious on you. The next issue promises to be completely off the wall -- a testimony to the anarchy of springtime, an ode to James Joyce and all the Irish tenors.
Ted Talks. I expect to be giving a TED talk pretty soon. I haven't made the deal yet, but it seems like the right venue. I considered the MOTH for telling stories, but I actually don't care for that format.
Purging the Mailing Newsletter. If you have received this week's newsletter, you have survived the purge -- 75 other people were deleted.... My hope is to send the letter only to people who actually want to read it. The typical Frog Hospital reader does not read every word of every issue -- that's not required -- but they do seem to enjoy the mix.
Most of you do not pay for a subscription. But some of you do pay and that makes it work for everyone.
After you pay the rent or the mortgage, after you've bought the groceries, after you've put a little money away for your children's and grandchildren's education -- after taking care of these necessaries -- then why not send a $25 check to Frog Hospital.
Subscriptions. Your subscription money keeps the editor from getting cranky and self-righteous. Your check for $25 helps me maintain a degree of detachment. I do not support a cause on these pages. And I am truly grateful. Please go to PayPal at the Frog Hospital blog and contribute $25.
Or mail your check for $25 to
35 West Main ST
Suite B #391
Ventura, CA 93001
Thank you very much,
Facebook. Some of best stuff is on Facebook. Go to my page, Fred Owens, and friend me